Newsroom

Legislative & Governmental Affairs

September 6, 2017 Hearing Before the House Ways And Means Social Security Subcommittee

AALJ President Marilyn Zahm testified at this hearing, as did Bea Disman, SSA Chief of Staff,; Kathryn Larin spoke about GAO’s Report Regarding the Agency’s Compassionate Allowance Initiative; Elizabeth McLaren appeared for the National Council of Disability Determination Directors; and Lisa Ekman of NOSSCR testified for the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities.  Their written testimony can be found on the House Ways and Means Subcommittee website: https://waysandmeans.house.gov/event/hearing-determining-eligibility-disability-benefits-challenges-facing-social-security-administration/ 

The following link will take you to video of the Subcommittee hearing (or at least part of it -- Ms. Disman’s oral statement may not be included): https://waysandmeans.house.gov/live/

Click here for AALJ’s written testimony that was filed with the Subcommittee.


SSA's Proposed AAJ/CARES Program and Proposed Legislation Allowing for Term Limited Hiring of ALJs Will Not Go Forward


          AALJ President Marilyn Zahm announced in her newsletter of August 25, 2016, that AALJ and the Agency have resolved their differences regarding these two important issues.  The Agency will not have Appeals Council attorney-examiner AAJs holding hearings, and they will request that the Office of Management and Budget shelve the proposed legislation for hiring term-limited ALJs.  AALJ and the Agency will work together to establish an ALJ cadre with particular expertise to hear and decide the non-disability cases.  Judge Zahm, Vice President Linda Stagno, and National Grievance Chair Rita Eppler were instrumental in achieving this agreement.

          In further discussion regarding ODAR operations and the pending backlog of hearing requests, AALJ and the Agency pledged they will work together to address the problems facing us.  Judge Zahm gave the Agency a list of recommendations to make the adjudicatory process more efficient.  Those suggestions are here

          The backlog of hearing requests is a problem which impacts everyone in ODAR.  The solutions proposed by management were attempts to address the issue, but in doing so our independence was significantly imperiled.  Not just our qualified decisional independence, but our continued existence as judges was at issue.  The efforts of AALJ led to Senate scrutiny of the Agency's proposal regarding attorney-examiner AAJs hearing non-disability cases.  The issues were thoroughly addressed in a hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs on May 12, 2016.  Judge Zahm testified on AALJ's behalf.  The AALJ arguments were persuasive, and with further discussion the Agency had a better understanding of our concerns.  With that, the Agency agreed to withdraw the AAJ proposal, as well as the recently proposed legislation to hire term-limited ALJs. 

          The backlog is still with us.  The Agency is still under enormous pressure to resolve it.  Judges are still under enormous pressure dealing with it.  We are all working toward the same goal.  Take a look at the AALJ recommendations.  They are made to help make our work more efficient, which in turn will allow for more decisions.

 
AALJ Testimony — Update: 7/25/11

Hearing Backlog — Update: 4/27/10


SSA OIG Reports

  • SSA OIG Report: Work Activity Overpayments— 4/09 [PDF]
    • From SSA OIG Audit Report, FOLLOW-UP ON DISABLED TITLE II BENEFICIARIES WITH EARNINGS REPORTED ON THE MASTER EARNINGS FILE, April 2009, A-01-08-28075, pp. 7-8:

      Our current review estimates that approximately $3.1 billion in overpayments existed because of disabled beneficiaries’ work activity. Although SSA identified about 58 percent of these overpayments, we estimate the remaining 42 percent—approximately $1.3 billion—went undetected by the Agency. In addition, we estimate SSA will continue to incorrectly pay about $382 million over the next 12 months to disabled beneficiaries no longer entitled to benefits if the Agency does not act.

      We recognize SSA’s efforts to improve the work-related CDR process. In addition, we acknowledge the Agency’s limited resources with which to perform this workload. However, we believe SSA may achieve greater savings in the long-term if it could provide the resources to perform more work-related CDRs.

  • SSA OIG Report: Dover, Delaware ODAR— 10/08 [PDF]
  • SSA OIG Report: ALJ & Hearing Office Performance— 8/08 [PDF]
  • SSA OIG Report: ALJ Caseload Performance — 2/08 [PDF]